Which FAR clause speaks to unusual and compelling urgency as a grounds for non-competitive contracting?

Study for the Contracting Officer Warrant Board Exam. Prepare with interactive questions, comprehensive explanations, and expert tips. Enhance your understanding and get exam-ready!

The correct clause that addresses unusual and compelling urgency as a basis for non-competitive contracting is found in FAR 6.302-2. This clause allows for exceptions to the requirement for full and open competition when there is a need for supplies or services that cannot be met through normal procurement methods due to urgent circumstances.

In situations where immediate delivery is critical—such as responding to disasters, military operations, or other compelling situations—this clause provides the legal justification for contracting without competition. The rationale behind this exception is to ensure that the government can respond swiftly to urgent needs, thereby maintaining operational readiness and addressing critical situations effectively.

Other clauses in FAR 6.302 address different bases for non-competitive contracting. For instance, FAR 6.302-1 pertains to certain unique or highly specialized capabilities needed from a specific source, while FAR 6.302-3 deals with contracts awarded to non-profit organizations to support research and development efforts for basic or applied research. FAR 6.302-4, on the other hand, allows for non-competitive procurement in cases of international agreements or treaties. Each of these clauses serves distinct scenarios, but when it comes specifically to unusual and compelling urgency, FAR 6.302-2 is the relevant

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy