What is required for a ratification of an unauthorized commitment?

For a ratification of an unauthorized commitment to be valid, it is essential that funds were available both at the time of the unauthorized commitment and continue to be available at the time of ratification. This requirement ensures that the government can meet its financial obligations without exceeding budgetary limits and adheres to the Anti-Deficiency Act, which prohibits federal agencies from obligating or spending more funds than what has been appropriated.

Ensuring the availability of funds at both critical points reinforces fiscal responsibility and accountability within government contracting. Without this assurance, approving an unauthorized commitment could lead to financial repercussions for the agency involved.

The other options, while relevant to broader contracting practices, do not directly pertain to the critical requirement for ratification. For instance, while it is good practice to have a contractor's agreement in writing, it is not a mandatory condition for ratification. Similarly, adjustments like audits or public announcements might improve transparency but are not strictly required for the ratification of an unauthorized commitment.