If information critical to the success of a program is proposed without corresponding evaluation criteria, what should be done?

In instances where critical information is proposed without accompanying evaluation criteria, establishing corresponding evaluation criteria is essential. This approach allows for a systematic way to assess the proposed information's relevance and efficacy in relation to the program's objectives. Without clear evaluation criteria, it becomes challenging to determine how to weigh or assess the proposed information effectively, which could jeopardize the program's success.

By creating evaluation criteria, stakeholders can ensure that all elements of the proposal are measured against the same standards, fostering a clearer understanding of their impact. This process aids in making informed decisions, ultimately enhancing the chances of the program achieving its goals and objectives.

Considering the other choices, simply including the information without evaluation criteria may lead to confusion or misinterpretation of its importance. Disregarding it completely ignores potentially valuable insights that could contribute to the program’s success. Removing it before submission might overlook the opportunity to properly assess its relevance. Therefore, developing corresponding evaluation criteria is the most constructive and strategic approach in this scenario.